Deriving Meaningful Criteria for Metal Leaching Potential

Abstract

Operating mines commonly manage geological materials based on their acid rock drainage potential, which can result in a binary classification based on well-defined criteria such as neutralization potential ratio. However, trace element leaching can occur over a continuum so that criteria for “metal” leaching potential depend on many site-specific factors such as mineralogical and chemical characteristics, pH and Eh conditions, waste physical characteristics, local climatic conditions and proximity to receiving environment, and therefore cannot be generic. This paper presents some concepts for development of metal leaching criteria based on statistical evaluation of trace element occurrences, linkage to elemental deportment in reactive minerals, and expected pH of weathering environments. These approaches are compared to common generic approaches. Trace elements that occur in association with readily soluble mineral phases or sulphides, which will release metals following oxidation, have higher potential for metal leaching in comparison to weathering-resistant mineralogical forms with low solubility such as silicates. For trace elements released from sulphide oxidation, metal leaching potential is also dependent on sulphide deportment. Trace element mobility is commonly dependent on pH of weathering environments, with elements speciating as cations showing higher mobility under relatively lower pH conditions and those speciating as oxyanion species (e.g., arsenic and selenium) showing greater leaching under alkaline conditions. The degree to which the latter elements leach is controlled by their mineralogical hosts and overall solid phase enrichment. The concepts will be discussed in the context of several sites where they have been applied.
 

Authors

Shauna Litke (Presenter) | SRK Consulting (Canada)

Jeff Clarke | SRK Consulting (Canada)

Stephen Day | SRK Consulting (Canada)

 

Click here to view all presentations at this event.