Reviewing Laubscher's Empirical Method to Estimate Subsidence Limits

Day Two | Session Six: Subsidence

Abstract

The increasing global demand for mineral resources and the depletion of significant high-grade, near-surface deposits is driving mining companies to consider cave mining as the ideal method to exploit large, low-grade deposits at depth. A key characteristic of cave mining is the formation of a significant surface subsidence crater, which may impact nearby infrastructures as well as have important environmental impacts. The most-used empirical method in cave mining for estimating subsidence damage limits is the Laubscher method (2000). The original dataset at the core of the Laubscher chart does not reflect the conditions of the modern caves (i.e. deeper orebodies, stronger rock masses and higher production rates). In addition, there is a need to review the definition of the cave material factor. 

This presentation examines the limitations related to the method and evaluates new cases from recent cave mining operations for checking the validity of the empirical subsidence chart.

Authors

  • Constanza Contreras, The University of British Columbia and SRK Canada
  • Andy Thomas, SRK Canada
  • Jarek Jakubec, SRK Canada
  • Davide Elmo, The University of British Columbia

SRK Presenter

  • Constanza Contreras, The University of British Columbia and SRK Canada

 

Click here to view other presentations at this event.