This website uses cookies to enhance browsing experience. Read below to see what cookies we recommend using and choose which to allow.
By clicking Accept All, you'll allow use of all our cookies in terms of our Privacy Notice.
Essential Cookies
Analytics Cookies
Marketing Cookies
Essential Cookies
Analytics Cookies
Marketing Cookies
By Hugo Melo
Author 1
Author 2
Author 3
Author 4
The amount of time, effort, risk, and cost to run an effective resource drilling campaign is not trivial. It is surprising, then, to find that after collecting and cataloging metres upon metres of drill core, very little analysis is completed.
The addition of multi-elements can provide orders of magnitude benefits to geometallurgy and geoenvironmental disciplines, not to mention the benefits of using multi-element geochemistry to find even more resources.
Predicting the geochemical reactivity of mine waste (e.g. waste rock, tailings, pit walls, borrow sources, etc.) is often only based on hundreds of samples, in stark contrast to the tens of thousands of samples used to develop the resource model. While the economics of a project are key, the lack of data for other disciplines results in creating significant long-term liabilities. This impacts mine waste management decisions mainly by creating overly conservative and onerous requirements for the mine site, high financial assurance requirements, and in many cases missing risks that manifest in post-closure.
One step forward for many resource development programs is the inclusion of multi-element analyses of the drill core at the same frequency as the commodity assay. The mine waste management benefits of doing this include:
Cost is often the main barrier to not including multi-element scans. However, if drill core is already being submitted for commodity assay, sample analysis can be a fraction of the assay cost per sample. The cost should be considered insignificant when considering the costs of managing the risks and uncertainties.