This website uses cookies to enhance browsing experience. Read below to see what cookies we recommend using and choose which to allow.
By clicking Accept All, you'll allow use of all our cookies in terms of our Privacy Notice.
Essential Cookies
Analytics Cookies
Marketing Cookies
Essential Cookies
Analytics Cookies
Marketing Cookies
Author 1
Author 2
Author 3
Author 4
Russian mining companies are mainly guided by compliance with the Russian Federation legislative requirements. Currently, these do not require specialized studies of such aspects as potential acid rock drainage and metal leaching from rocks and processing waste to be undertaken. Nevertheless, in recent years, Russian environmental legislation has started to consider the implementation of the principle of "best available technologies", which, among other things, considers good international industry practices. To date, however, most of the requirements are advisory in nature.
Traditionally, geochemical assessment of mines in Russia has largely gone unnoticed due to the lack of regulatory requirements. Waste rock material and processing waste (tailings) are given hazard categories based on biotesting that does not account for acid rock drainage and metal leaching (ARDML). Based on this biotesting, mining and processing waste is most often classified as "practically non-hazardous waste", and the design solutions and environmental monitoring cannot fully assess these impacts and mitigate them.
For example, in 2019-2020, local concern emerged over drainage from the abandoned Levikhinsky (copper-pyrite ore) mine near the Levikha settlement (near Kirovgrad, Urals), impacting the Tagil River. Local pressure and media coverage have led to the regional government requesting assessment of technologies to control and treat the drainage with lime to neutralize the mine waters.
In addition to the key commercial metals, copper, zinc, sulfur, gold, silver, selenium, germanium, and cadmium, the Levikhinsky ore also contains lead, tin, arsenic, antimony, tellurium, and indium. No closure and reclamation activities were carried out when production stopped in 2003, and in 2004 the mine was flooded. In 2010, the mine became state property.
Currently, the contaminated mine water, rain and snow melt water from the waste dumps are directed to the technical pond for neutralization. The ponds overflow into the Levikha River, and then to the Tagil River. It is estimated that approximately 6,500t of lime is required annually to treat the contaminated water; however, it is currently not possible to completely remove the contaminants. For example, the concentrations of zinc and copper alone in the Tagil River after the confluence of the Levikha River exceeds the local water quality standards by up to 80 times.
A more proactive approach of assessing the potential problems before they occur and planning accordingly could have minimized both the costs and the resulting impacts.
Good stewardship in the mining industry globally requires a comprehensive approach to evaluating closure studies during initial mine planning, not just for closed or abandoned mines, to ensure the full costs of mining from cradle to grave are covered in the economics of the life cycle of the mining operation. Closure and rehabilitation solutions should be planned based on local environmental and social conditions. Particular attention should be paid to predicting the ARDML potential from waste rock and processing waste, as well as modelling the possible composition of mine water and drainage water from waste rock dumps and tailings. With this information from the early stages of the project, it is possible to develop appropriate measures to minimize impacts and reduce overall costs and liabilities, making both good financial and technical sense.