This website uses cookies to enhance browsing experience. Read below to see what cookies we recommend using and choose which to allow.
By clicking Accept All, you'll allow use of all our cookies in terms of our Privacy Notice.
Essential Cookies
Analytics Cookies
Marketing Cookies
Essential Cookies
Analytics Cookies
Marketing Cookies
By Andrea Russo, Esteban Hormazábal
Full title: Correlations between Various Rock Mass Classifications Systems, Including Laubscher (MRMR), Bieniawski (RMR), Barton (Q)and Hoek and Marinos (GSI) Systems
Empirical rock mass classification systems are widely used in the practice of mining engineering, especially in the early stages of engineering design of mining infrastructure. This stage involves preliminary assessment of ground support needs for drifts and shafts, stability analysis of pillars and stopes, stability analysis of slopes in open pit mines, and others. During this preliminary stage of the design, mining engineers are required to consider different mining methods and mine designs, as well as underground and open pit alternatives. Crucial to design is the proper characterization of the rock mass, during and after the field data collection phase, in terms of available rock mass classification systems, such as Laubscher (MRMR), Bieniawski (RMR), Barton (Q) and Hoek & Marinos (GSI) systems.
Because the rock mass characterization is normally done in terms of one (or rarely more than one) of these systems, and because different mechanical assessment tools used in this and later stages of mining design typically are expressed in any of the systems, it is important to be able to properly correlate rock mass classification ratings in the different rock mass classification systems. This process of correlating the ratings is not straightforward and has not been extensively treated in the literature. The aim of this paper is to address the problem of correlating rock mass classification information, and to propose new relationships for correlation of ratings, in particular, equations that allow to correlate the Laubscher and the Bieniawski systems, and the Barton and the Hoek Marinos systems.
SRK conducted a scoping study of the underground components of two uranium deposits in Labrador, Canada.
Learn MoreThe objective of installing ground support is to mitigate the risk of injuries and costs associated with rehabilitating excavation damage and associated production downtime.
Learn MoreCorporate Consultant (Rock Mechanics)
Please let me know how I can help you, and I will respond as soon as possible.
Send me a copy of my message
I agree that my information will be used to contact me and not for any other purposes. To see our privacy policy, click here.
We’ve received your submission.
Managing Director Chile, Corporate Consultant (Rock Mechanics and Tunnelling Services)
Please let me know how I can help you, and I will respond as soon as possible.
Send me a copy of my message
I agree that my information will be used to contact me and not for any other purposes. To see our privacy policy, click here.
We’ve received your submission.
Corporate Consultant (Rock Mechanics)
Please let me know how I can help you, and I will respond as soon as possible.
Send me a copy of my message
I agree that my information will be used to contact me and not for any other purposes. To see our privacy policy, click here.
We’ve received your submission.
Managing Director Chile, Corporate Consultant (Rock Mechanics and Tunnelling Services)
Please let me know how I can help you, and I will respond as soon as possible.
Send me a copy of my message
I agree that my information will be used to contact me and not for any other purposes. To see our privacy policy, click here.
We’ve received your submission.