This website uses cookies to enhance browsing experience. Read below to see what cookies we recommend using and choose which to allow.
By clicking Accept All, you'll allow use of all our cookies in terms of our Privacy Notice.
Essential Cookies
Analytics Cookies
Marketing Cookies
Essential Cookies
Analytics Cookies
Marketing Cookies
By Hugo Melo
Author 1
Author 2
Author 3
Author 4
Over the decades, with decreasing ore deposit grades, miners have turned to economies of scale and bulk mining to gain advantage. This has resulted in an inherent diluting of ore feed to the mill. However, a point is being reached for most ore deposits where the mill feed grades for the larger selective mining unit (SMU) sizes are too low to be deemed economic. So what can we do to improve the quality of mill feed? Mineral processors have long had to consider “mineral liberation”. The smaller the grain size, the more likely a particle will contain pure or near pure mineral, which can then be separated and retrieved by various methods. However, what now needs to be considered by both mineral processors and miners is “waste liberation”. At what size does a particle or batch of mined material have insufficient mineralization to exceed the cut-off grade and can no longer be deemed “ore”? That is the key to improving the quality of mill feed. This paper explores methods of gaining orebody knowledge, such as assessing heterogeneity, rock hardness and mineral size deportment, so that informed decisions can be made on SMU sizes, grade control strategies, and ore sorting (batch and particle) strategies.